Video clips from The Copenhagen Interpretation 2004 (http://www.ph.utexas.edu/movies/).

Views: 51923
Patrik Čermák

What is COPENHAGEN INTERPRETATION? What does COPENHAGEN INTERPRETATION mean? COPENHAGEN INTERPRETATION meaning - COPENHAGEN INTERPRETATION definition - COPENHAGEN INTERPRETATION explanation.
Source: Wikipedia.org article, adapted under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ license.
The Copenhagen interpretation is an expression of the meaning of quantum mechanics that was largely devised in the years 1925 to 1927 by Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg. It remains one of the most commonly taught interpretations of quantum mechanics.
According to the Copenhagen interpretation, physical systems generally do not have definite properties prior to being measured, and quantum mechanics can only predict the probabilities that measurements will produce certain results. The act of measurement affects the system, causing the set of probabilities to reduce to only one of the possible values immediately after the measurement. This feature is known as wavefunction collapse.
There have been many objections to the Copenhagen Interpretation over the years. Some have objected to the discontinuous jumps when there is an observation, the probabilistic element introduced upon observation, the subjectiveness of requiring an observer, the difficulty of defining a measuring device or to the necessity of invoking classical physics to describe the "laboratory" in which the results are measured.
Alternatives to the Copenhagen Interpretation include the many-worlds interpretation, the De Broglie-Bohm (pilot-wave) interpretation, and quantum decoherence theories.

Views: 8175
The Audiopedia

Link to my video on the Double Slit Experiment: https://youtu.be/rzrQ7IXYB3Q
Link to my survey!:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/NWZLNF7 music: https://www.bensound.com/royalty-free-music/world-others music: https://www.bensound.com/royalty-free-music/world-others

Views: 899
Physics Fun

Is our universe a definitive single reality or is it merely one within an infinitely branching multiverse? Be sure to check out Physics Girl’s Dianna Cowern for more awesome science https://www.youtube.com/c/physicsgirl
Get your own Space Time tshirt at http://bit.ly/1QlzoBi
Tweet at us! @pbsspacetime
Facebook: facebook.com/pbsspacetime
Email us! pbsspacetime [at] gmail [dot] com
Comment on Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/pbsspacetime
Support us on Patreon! http://www.patreon.com/pbsspacetime
Help translate our videos! http://www.youtube.com/timedtext_cs_panel?tab=2&c=UC7_gcs09iThXybpVgjHZ_7g
The Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics tells us that observation collapses a probability wave into a single definitive outcome, but this isn’t the only interpretation of quantum mechanics. The many worlds theory proposes that the wavefunction never actually collapses. The observer simply follows one of those many possible paths into their present reality while all the other paths continue on independent of the observer. Each of these paths branches off into an entirely different reality. In this episode Matt discusses the details of the many worlds theory and why it’s not so far-fetched to think that our reality is simply one of an infinite number of realities existing within space time.
Links to sources:
The Quantum Experiment that Broke Reality
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-MNSLsjjdo
Hugh Everett's Ph.D. Dissertation
http://www-tc.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/manyworlds/pdf/dissertation.pdf
Crazy Pool Vortex
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnbJEg9r1o8
Previous Episode
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jowVq81AgGw
Written and hosted by Matt O’Dowd
Produced by Rusty Ward
Made by Kornhaber Brown (www.kornhaberbrown.com)

Views: 1408908
PBS Space Time

Read full article
https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=9&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjYntqev6nNAhWiCcAKHVtpDaoQFghPMAg&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.informationphilosopher.com%2Fintroduction%2Fphysics%2Fcopenhagen_interpretation.html&usg=AFQjCNGqUdBoO0y4bvwKleCmHeANN_6vBw&sig2=B5DT5ML9mTKm4Bxi1P6KkA

Views: 2866
Quantum Realities

The double slit experiment radically changed the way we understand reality. To check out any of the lectures available from The Great Courses Plus go to http://ow.ly/QVaz302duhX and get ready to learn about everything from cooking to calculus.
Get your own Space Time tshirt at http://bit.ly/1QlzoBi
Tweet at us! @pbsspacetime
Facebook: facebook.com/pbsspacetime
Email us! pbsspacetime [at] gmail [dot] com
Comment on Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/pbsspacetime
Support us on Patreon! http://www.patreon.com/pbsspacetime
Help translate our videos! http://www.youtube.com/timedtext_cs_panel?tab=2&c=UC7_gcs09iThXybpVgjHZ_7g
The double slit experiment radically changed the way we understand reality. Find out what the ramifications of this experiment were and how we can use it to better comprehend our universe.
Written and hosted by Matt O’Dowd
Made by Kornhaber Brown (www.kornhaberbrown.com)
Previous Episode https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJ2RNBAFLj0
The Planck Length and the Origin of Quantum Mechanics
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQSbms5MDvY
Veritasium and the Double Slit Experiment
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzbKb59my3U
Is Quantum Tunneling Faster than Light?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-IfmgyXs7z8
Comments by:
Jason Blank
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NqbRcwWwPw&lc=z13mhf0rcurtybftb23nf3yalruqvx2dm
Deisisase
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NqbRcwWwPw&lc=z13uifuzxlr3xvc1022ly1jo4uijfjhgj04
Bike Jake
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NqbRcwWwPw&lc=z13mcnhbglncgpbc122wgxsabw31xdvqw04
An Imposter
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NqbRcwWwPw&lc=z12hyl5z4lvsjdihn04cgbhbsnnivhbgdqw0k

Views: 3600280
PBS Space Time

View full lesson: http://ed.ted.com/lessons/schrodinger-s-cat-a-thought-experiment-in-quantum-mechanics-chad-orzel
Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger, one of the founders of quantum mechanics, posed this famous question: If you put a cat in a sealed box with a device that has a 50% chance of killing the cat in the next hour, what will be the state of the cat when that time is up? Chad Orzel investigates this thought experiment.
Lesson by Chad Orzel, animation by Agota Vegso.

Views: 3244219
TED-Ed

Check: https://youtu.be/Hs_chZSNL9I
The World of Quantum - Full Documentary HD
http://www.advexon.com For more Scientific DOCUMENTARIES.
Subscribe for more Videos...
Quantum mechanics (QM -- also known as quantum physics, or quantum theory) is a branch of physics which deals with physical phenomena at nanoscopic scales where the action is on the order of the Planck constant. It departs from classical mechanics primarily at the quantum realm of atomic and subatomic length scales. Quantum mechanics provides a mathematical description of much of the dual particle-like and wave-like behavior and interactions of energy and matter. Quantum mechanics provides a substantially useful framework for many features of the modern periodic table of elements including the behavior of atoms during chemical bonding and has played a significant role in the development of many modern technologies.
In advanced topics of quantum mechanics, some of these behaviors are macroscopic (see macroscopic quantum phenomena) and emerge at only extreme (i.e., very low or very high) energies or temperatures (such as in the use of superconducting magnets). For example, the angular momentum of an electron bound to an atom or molecule is quantized. In contrast, the angular momentum of an unbound electron is not quantized. In the context of quantum mechanics, the wave--particle duality of energy and matter and the uncertainty principle provide a unified view of the behavior of photons, electrons, and other atomic-scale objects.
The mathematical formulations of quantum mechanics are abstract. A mathematical function, the wavefunction, provides information about the probability amplitude of position, momentum, and other physical properties of a particle. Mathematical manipulations of the wavefunction usually involve bra--ket notation which requires an understanding of complex numbers and linear functionals. The wavefunction formulation treats the particle as a quantum harmonic oscillator, and the mathematics is akin to that describing acoustic resonance. Many of the results of quantum mechanics are not easily visualized in terms of classical mechanics. For instance, in a quantum mechanical model the lowest energy state of a system, the ground state, is non-zero as opposed to a more "traditional" ground state with zero kinetic energy (all particles at rest). Instead of a traditional static, unchanging zero energy state, quantum mechanics allows for far more dynamic, chaotic possibilities, according to John Wheeler.
The earliest versions of quantum mechanics were formulated in the first decade of the 20th century. About this time, the atomic theory and the corpuscular theory of light (as updated by Einstein)[1] first came to be widely accepted as scientific fact; these latter theories can be viewed as quantum theories of matter and electromagnetic radiation, respectively. Early quantum theory was significantly reformulated in the mid-1920s by Werner Heisenberg, Max Born and Pascual Jordan, (matrix mechanics); Louis de Broglie and Erwin Schrödinger (wave mechanics); and Wolfgang Pauli and Satyendra Nath Bose (statistics of subatomic particles). Moreover, the Copenhagen interpretation of Niels Bohr became widely accepted. By 1930, quantum mechanics had been further unified and formalized by the work of David Hilbert, Paul Dirac and John von Neumann[2] with a greater emphasis placed on measurement in quantum mechanics, the statistical nature of our knowledge of reality, and philosophical speculation about the role of the observer. Quantum mechanics has since permeated throughout many aspects of 20th-century physics and other disciplines including quantum chemistry, quantum electronics, quantum optics, and quantum information science. Much 19th-century physics has been re-evaluated as the "classical limit" of quantum mechanics and its more advanced developments in terms of quantum field theory, string theory, and speculative quantum gravity theories. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsVGut7G-dU
quantum solace, quantum world, #quantum

Views: 7411467
Advexon Science Network

Julia explains what she learned about quantum mechanics (and in particular the Many Worlds interpretation) from a chat with physicist Sean Carroll.
Check out the episode of the podcast I'm referencing here, at:
http://rationallyspeakingpodcast.org/show/rs133-sean-carroll-on-the-many-worlds-interpretation-is-prob.html
(And read more about me at http://juliagalef.com)

Views: 172170
Julia Galef

Kopenhagener Deutung - eine der mehreren Interpretationen der Quantenmechanik, die in den Schulen und Universitäten so gelehrt wird, als gäbe es keine Alternativen... In diesem Video lernst du die Merkmale der dominierenden Kopenhagener Deutung kennen. Sie wurde hauptsächlich von den Vätern der Quantenmechanik, Niels Bohr und Werner Heisenberg formuliert und basiert auf Wahrscheinlichkeit, die nicht mit der klassischen Wahrscheinlichkeit unseres Alltags vergleichbar ist. Das Ergebnis eines Würfels lässt sich unter der Voraussetzung, dass man alle auf ihn einwirkenden Kräfte kennt, berechnen; während das Verhalten eines Quantenobjekts (z.B. Elektron), sich naturgemäß nicht berechnen lässt. An einem Doppelspalt-Experiment sieht man diese Unvorhersagbarkeit deutlich. Sogar Teilchen sind in der Lage Interferenz am Schirm zu verursachen; vorausgesetzt: sie werden nicht gemessen. Sobald eine Messung stattfindet, verschwindet das Interferenzmuster; weil die Superposition des Quantenobjekts -- laut der Kopenhagener Deutung -- zerstört wird (Kollaps der Wellenfunktion). Ein wichtiger Bestandteil dieser Interpretation neben dem Korrespondenzprinzip, ist auch der Welle-Teilchen-Dualismus. Ein Quantenobjekt, das sich sowohl als ein Teilchen und auch als eine Welle charakterisiert und niemals vorhersagbar ist? Albert Einstein war jedenfalls damit nicht einverstanden, weshalb er mit zwei anderen Physikern das EPR-Paradoxon (Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Paradoxon) formulierte und eher das Konzept "Verborgene-Variablen-Theorie" verfolgte. Zu diesem Konzept gehört beispielsweise die Bohmsche Mechanik.
Kopenhagener Deutung - Lernsammlung:
https://universaldenker.de/theorien/48
Wer ist der Sprecher?
https://universaldenker.de/alexander-fufaev

Views: 25909
Universaldenker

To help support this ministry click here: http://www.patreon.com/inspiringphilosophy
This is a video presenting the objections to the Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. I argue from skeptics in physics, it is not a complete interpretation and doesn't compete with stand interpretations.
Music:
Two Steps from Hell - Love & Loss
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FlfAOSYOs4E
Mervin Mathew - Battle Begins
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGxLWcN06n8
Sources:
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9703089
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-manyworlds/
http://www.physics.wustl.edu/alford/many_worlds_FAQ.html
http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.4481
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20600-quantum-magic-trick-shows-reality-is-what-you-make-it.html
http://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0011086.pdf
http://arxiv.org/abs/0905.0624
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0110148
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0312059
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0103043
http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.2189
http://arxiv.org/pdf/0801.0337.pdf

Views: 46834
InspiringPhilosophy

Even the professional understanding of quantum mechanics is "embarrassing", says cosmologist Sean Carroll.
Read Sean's blog on this subject at http://bit.ly/V1SUpV and the full paper at http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.1069
We filmed with Sean during his visit to the University of Nottingham and will have more videos with him coming soon.
Check out Sean's website (and his excellent books) at: http://preposterousuniverse.com/
Read his Higgs Boson book: http://amzn.to/Nvdn8P
Visit the SIxty Symbols website at http://www.sixtysymbols.com/
We're on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/sixtysymbols
And Twitter at http://twitter.com/#!/periodicvideos
This project features scientists from The University of Nottingham
http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/physics/index.aspx
Sixty Symbols videos by Brady Haran
A run-down of Brady's channels:
http://periodicvideos.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/here-are-my-channels.html

Views: 770092
Sixty Symbols

Google Tech Talk
January 6, 2011
Presented by Ron Garret.
ABSTRACT
Richard Feynman once famously quipped that no one understands quantum mechanics, and popular accounts continue to promulgate the view that QM is an intractable mystery (probably because that helps to sell books). QM is certainly unintuitive, but the idea that no one understands it is far from the truth. In fact, QM is no more difficult to understand than relativity. The problem is that the vast majority of popular accounts of QM are simply flat-out wrong. They are based on the so-called Copenhagen interpretation of QM, which has been thoroughly discredited for decades. It turns out that if Copenhagen were true then it would be possible to communicate faster than light, and hence send signals backwards in time. This talk describes an alternative interpretation based on quantum information theory (QIT) which is consistent with current scientific knowledge. It turns out that there is a simple intuition that makes almost all quantum mysteries simply evaporate, and replaces them with an easily understood (albeit strange) insight: measurement and entanglement are the same physical phenomenon, and you don't really exist.
Slides are available here:
https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/present/edit?id=0AelF4upZ7VjZZGM1eGttOGJfNDNkenFtNnFkaw&hl=en
Link to the paper:
http://www.flownet.com/ron/QM.pdf
About the speaker:
Dr. Ron Garret was an AI and robotics researcher at the NASA Jet Propulsion Lab for fifteen years before taking a year off to work at Google in June of 2000. He was the lead engineer on the first release of AdWords, and the original author of the Google Translation Console. Since leaving Google he has started a new career as an entrepreneur, angel investor and filmmaker. He has co-founded three startups, invested in a dozen others, and made a feature-length documentary about homelessness.

Views: 1602181
GoogleTechTalks

Although Einstein’s Mind was strongly intuitive and imaginative being a practical explorer he transformed all this for logical expectations and risks based on the “Schrödinger’s Cat’s” realistic exclusivity. Although Bohr’s and Heisenberg’s Minds were strongly logically thinkative being Mathematicians they chose for the intuitive uncertainty based on “Schrödinger’s Cat’s” probability of the disintegration of atoms.

Views: 389
Leonardo Bastiani

This video gives an objective reality to quantum mechanics! Giving us an alternative to the Copenhagen Interpretation explaining reality as a continuum where new quantum particles our continuously being formed. We feel this process as the forward passage of time itself that forms the geometry of spacetime.
The quantum wave-particle function that is explained mathematically by Schrödinger's wave equation represents the forward passage of time itself photon by photon or moment by moment.
Therefore Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle is the same uncertainty that we have with any future event and time is the Hidden Variable of quantum physics.

Views: 3519
Dyslexic Artist Theory on the Physics of 'Time'

There’s one interpretation of the meaning of quantum mechanics that manages to skip a lot of the unphysical weirdness of the mainstream interpretations: it's de Broglie-Bohm pilot wave theory.
Help us continue making this show by contributing here: https://www.patreon.com/pbsspacetime
Get your own Space Time tshirt at http://bit.ly/1QlzoBi
Tweet at us! @pbsspacetime
Facebook: facebook.com/pbsspacetime
Email us! pbsspacetime [at] gmail [dot] com
Comment on Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/pbsspacetime
Help tranlate our videos! https://www.youtube.com/timedtext_cs_panel?tab=2&c=UC7_gcs09iThXybpVgjHZ_7g
There are some pretty out-there explanations for the processes at work behind the incredibly successful mathematics of quantum mechanics - things are both waves and particles at the same time, the act of observation defines reality, cats are alive and dead, or even: the universe is constantly splitting into infinite alternate realities. The weird results of quantum experiments seem to demand weird explanations of the nature of reality. In this episode, Matt discusses de Broglie-Bohm pilot wave theory, the one interpretation of quantum mechanics that remains comfortably, stodgily physical.
Links to Sources
The Quantum Experiment that Broke Reality
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-MNSLsjjdo&t=53s
The Many Worlds of the Quantum Multiverse
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dzKWfw68M5U&t=690s
Is This What Quantum Mechanics Looks Like?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIyTZDHuarQ
A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of "Hidden" Variables. I:
David Bohm, 1952, Phys. Rev. 85, 166
http://journals.aps.org/pr/abstract/10.1103/PhysRev.85.166
Bohms original paper is behind the journal paywall (sorry!), however many other readings on Bohmian mechanics are available here:
http://www.bohmian-mechanics.net/readings_books.html
Previous Space Time Episode
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4RNGRyzt10
Written and hosted by Matt O’Dowd
Produced by Rusty Ward
Made by Kornhaber Brown (www.kornhaberbrown.com)
Comments Answered by Matt
Burak Bağdatlı
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4RNGRyzt10&lc=z13hvpcjrlndslnyb04cctjqrvb4hpkphe4
Sebastián López
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4RNGRyzt10&lc=z124yxrjyw3ywvicm23wspagcxracphvg
The757packerfan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4RNGRyzt10&lc=z13ujbnznvmfjnhag04cgtprtriafnj4t2k
Special thanks to our Patreon Hypernova and Quasar Supporters:
Joel Brinton
Antonio Park
Alastair Taft
Clock Watcher
Joe
John Hofmann
Thanks to our Patreon Gamma Ray Burst Supporters:
Jade Bilkey
Kevin Warne
JJ Bagnell
J Rejc
Bernardo Higuera
Michael Fischer
Dylan Merida
Colette Weeks
Amy Jie
Anthony Caridi
Avi Goldfinger
Corey Smeaton
John Pettit
Shannan Catalano
Florian Stinglmayr
Yubo Du
Benoit Pagé-Guitard
Ronny Polonia
Nathan Leniz
Jessica Fraley
Kirk Mathews
Loro Lukic
Carl P. Corliss
Brandon labonte
David Crane
Greg Weiss
David Matteson
Marc Lagarde
Eric Jackson
Will and Sonja Marple

Views: 1118911
PBS Space Time

Copenhagen interpretation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copenhagen_interpretation
Hugh Everett
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_Everett_III
What the Bleep Do We Know!?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know!%3F

Views: 2396
Prince شجاع البغدادي

This video was a submission for the Breakthrough Junior Challenge in 2018. #breakthroughjuniorchallenge

Views: 315
Sravan Gogulapati

Learn more about How to Teach Physics to Your Dog at http://books.simonandschuster.ca/How-to-Teach-Physics-to-Your-Dog/Chad-Orzel/9781416572299?mcd=vd_youtube_book Chapter 3 of Chad Orzel’s How to Teach Physics to Your Dog

Views: 2880
Simon & Schuster Books

#breakthroughjuniorchallenge

Views: 116
Safa Helal

What we know and what we don't know. There are 3 conventional schools of thought on Quantum Mechanics: there is the Orthodox position which is the Copenhagen interpretation of Quantum Physics who use the Schrodinger-Dirac formalisms based on Max Born's Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copenhagen_interpretation) Heisenberg's Matrix formalisms were later shown to be mathematically identical to Shrodinger's Hilbert Space (abstract vector spaces with all the properties of function spaces) based mathematics. This school of thought maintains that quantum mechanics can only be understood in this way (from the observation of photons) and we'll never be able to figure out or understand the inner workings of what's really going on inside the atom. This school of thought is content with not knowing where photons come from during drops in energy states, and maintain that this is just the way it is. PERIOD.
There is the Agnostic Position, they don't care they just use what works and don't get involved in the debates or philosophies.
And then there is the Realist Position which is the one that Einstein and Planck took. Planck maintained that we needed to figure out how his constant was derived from deeper physics, but Heisenberg just rolled with it...
Einstein swore till his death bed that this interpretation of quantum physics was wrong, but could never figure out the answer to make everything work.
The argument rages on about the deeper physics of what is really going on, and what types of things will be unlocked once we finally do figure it out...
Till then...
A paper on unsolved problems in Quantum Physics:
http://www.azonano.com/news.asp?newsID=6725
Top Ten unsolved problems in Physics: (one person's list anyway)
http://www.oglethorpe.edu/faculty/~m_rulison/top10.htm
And of course this fun list:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unsolved_problems_in_physics

Views: 64542
ColdFusionNow

"What Is The Copenhagen Interpretation?
Watch more videos for more knowledge
The Copenhagen Interpretation - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch/Um0AvHrPp_w
What is COPENHAGEN INTERPRETATION? What ... https://www.youtube.com/watch/FG0mfwRLHp8
The Copenhagen Interpretation - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch/-wgF_HhgXCw
The Copenhagen Interpretation - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch/x6YG9EpdpRA
What was the Copenhagen Interpretation and the ... https://www.youtube.com/watch/eEZqpAjq6UY
Copenhagen interpretation - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch/4FKgBF2x2mk
HTPIB27M The Copenhagen Interpretation - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch/gcVj-_ffrzM
What Is The Copenhagen Interpretation? - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch/lzzBNTeZlr4
Schr�dinger's Dog: The Copenhagen Interpretation ... https://www.youtube.com/watch/R1EzcELy1CE
The Copenhagen Interpretation: Quantum ... https://www.youtube.com/watch/gljTAFeZvvQ
Copenhagen Interpretation - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch/qrj0M6Fy8cM
Copenhagen Interpretation = Shut Up & Calculate ... https://www.youtube.com/watch/zc_65btAXrQ
The Copenhagen Interpretation (Original) - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch/TJw5wbUlbNI
An alternative to the Copenhagen Interpretation of ... https://www.youtube.com/watch/bZ--0XFrxoI
A Novel Approach for 'Making Sense' out of the ... https://www.youtube.com/watch/GurBISsM308
Double Slit Experiment and the Copenhagen ... https://www.youtube.com/watch/232AKNM8Jj4
Schrodinger's Cat and the Copenhagen ... https://www.youtube.com/watch/8T9zFLAW1pg
Copenhagen Interpretation - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch/kITALhEPrmc
Copenhagen interpretation of ""The Double Slit ... https://www.youtube.com/watch/MlAx4azg300
The Quantum Experiment that Broke Reality | Space ... https://www.youtube.com/watch/p-MNSLsjjdo"

Views: 65
S AnswerZ

Leonard Susskind's lecture on Copenhagen vs Everrett, and ER=EPR given at University of California, Santa Barbara
Lecture date: May 05, 2016

Views: 1901
mrtp

Erwin Schrödinger - a major violator of the Laws of Physics. Also a drug dealer
Either you're gonna shoot me or I'm gonna spray whipped cream in your eye and walk outta here like a big shot!

Views: 2772
Chris Thompson

www.3deadfans.com Review of The Walking Dead
Season 7 Episode 7 "Sing me a song"

Views: 14
3DeadFans

a music video by the copenhagan interpretation.

Views: 1401
ekpoll

This is an audio version of the Wikipedia Article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copenhagen_interpretation
00:01:15 1 Background
00:03:07 2 Origin of the term
00:05:08 3 Current status of the term
00:05:35 4 Principles
00:08:19 5 Metaphysics of the wave function
00:10:50 6 Born rule
00:12:45 7 Nature of collapse
00:14:13 8 Non-separability of the wave function
00:15:48 9 Wave–particle dilemma
00:17:34 10 Acceptance among physicists
00:18:29 11 Consequences
00:23:25 12 Criticism
00:29:09 13 Alternatives
00:30:58 14 See also
00:31:27 15 Notes and references
00:31:36 16 Further reading
00:32:22 17 External links
Listening is a more natural way of learning, when compared to reading. Written language only began at around 3200 BC, but spoken language has existed long ago.
Learning by listening is a great way to:
- increases imagination and understanding
- improves your listening skills
- improves your own spoken accent
- learn while on the move
- reduce eye strain
Now learn the vast amount of general knowledge available on Wikipedia through audio (audio article). You could even learn subconsciously by playing the audio while you are sleeping! If you are planning to listen a lot, you could try using a bone conduction headphone, or a standard speaker instead of an earphone.
Listen on Google Assistant through Extra Audio:
https://assistant.google.com/services/invoke/uid/0000001a130b3f91
Other Wikipedia audio articles at:
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=wikipedia+tts
Upload your own Wikipedia articles through:
https://github.com/nodef/wikipedia-tts
"There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance."
- Socrates
SUMMARY
=======
The Copenhagen interpretation is an expression of the meaning of quantum mechanics that was largely devised in the years 1925 to 1927 by Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg. It remains one of the most commonly taught interpretations of quantum mechanics.According to the Copenhagen interpretation, physical systems generally do not have definite properties prior to being measured, and quantum mechanics can only predict the probabilities that measurements will produce certain results. The act of measurement affects the system, causing the set of probabilities to reduce to only one of the possible values immediately after the measurement. This feature is known as wave function collapse.
There have been many objections to the Copenhagen interpretation over the years. These include: discontinuous jumps when there is an observation, the probabilistic element introduced upon observation, the subjectiveness of requiring an observer, the difficulty of defining a measuring device, and the necessity of invoking classical physics to describe the "laboratory" in which the results are measured.
Alternatives to the Copenhagen interpretation include the many-worlds interpretation, the De Broglie–Bohm (pilot-wave) interpretation, quantum Bayesianism, and quantum decoherence theories.

Views: 11
wikipedia tts

The world of quantum mechanics is magical. In it, our particles exist in multiple places at once, exhibit wave like behavior, can move through matter and a number of other crazy amazing things.
#breakthroughjuniorchallenge

Views: 197
Aalia Habib

Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics is still a controversial topic, we still do not have a well-recieved interpretation now.We will dicuss one of the most popular interpretations today, and dicuss several others in the next episode.
Copenhagen Interpretation is a kind of anti-realism interpretation, they believe that dynamical variables does not make sense before measurement. Measurement is not an activity that brought out the value of the dynamical variable that has objectively existed before, it is rather an activity that produce the dynamical variables.
About Quantum Mechanics for High School Level:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLMiUmTiP5CsI7r3hgrRNKi0zkS0fDwzbd
This is a series of videos telling the brilliant story of Quantum Mechanics, from the history to experiments, from mathematical structures to interpretations. In order to make it comprehensible for the general public, I suppose that the viewers are in high school level, and would not use too much mathematical skills. I have cut some complicated mathematical calculations that generally would be part of the quantum mechanics course in university, I have also cut anything that requires techniques of solving differential equations, trying to use just a little bit of linear algebra to show you the most significant physical pictures and core concepts of quantum mechanics. Hope you guys like it!
Basic structure of this series of videos:
I. Introduction
a. Overviw
b. History of Development of Quantum Mechanics
c. Several Experiments that Quantum Mechanics was born from
d .Discussion on the necessity of Quantum Mechanics from a general Philosophical ground
II. Foundations of Quantum Mechanics
a. Basic Assumptions
(the principle of superposition of states )
b. Basic Concepts
c. Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics
III. Mathematical Structure
a. Vectors
b. Dirac Notation
Ket & Bras, Operators, Commutators
c. Evolution of States

Views: 14
Photon F

An attempt at explaining science with the (free) LEGO StoryStarter kit.

Views: 3770
StevieSteven

This is a talk I gave at the Quantum Theory: Reconsideration of Foundations 6 Conference in Vaxjo, Sweden on June 12th, 2012. It summarizes a framework based on some original ideas for making sense out of the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics, and provides an interpretation that is closest in spirit to the Copenhagen Interpretation, except that it provides answers to several "why" questions which that interpretation leaves unresolved. I hope you will find this framework interesting.
A few clarifications on specific ideas I tried to convey in my talk but now think didn't do very well:
9:42 I meant to simply state this: in order for two time dimensions to be distinct, they must be orthogonal because from special relativity we know that non-orthogonal time dimensions cannot be distinguished.
11:51 When I said" What happens when the period is longer than tau_a" I misspoke. tau_A is proportional to the period no matter how long. What I meant to say was, "what happens if we consider time intervals that are longer than the period."
12:34 the "geometric set up" I refer to is just this: Two orthogonal time dimensions, one of which is finite and therefore "shorter" than the other (which keeps on increasing), and which are compared indirectly by means of the periodic rotation of the amplitude in the abstract plane formed by them.
13:02 the part I skipped was going to show why the postulated mechanism for indirectly comparing the two time dimensions can be considered a "symmetry": the mechanism is invariant under time reversal because the rotation of the amplitude must go both forward and backward 'simultaneously'. This is required in order to avoid for the indirect comparison to become a net transformation between the time dimensions (A net transformation would imply that the time dimensions are no longer orthogonal, and therefore no longer distinct. This claim follows directly from the fact that in Special Relativity there are two time parameters, proper time and coordinate time, which are related to each other by the Lorentz factor, gamma. One way to think of gamma inverse is that it tells us how much of coordinate time is "projected" onto coordinate time: If 1/gamma is 1 (i.e. observer is at rest relative to what he is observing) all of it is, and if 1/gamma is zero, none of it is projected, which is to say, in that case only the two time parameters cannot be expressed in terms of each other. This is exactly like the orthogonality between vectors). But that means each phase factor derived from this mechanism is only associated with one factor of the product of two factors which represents all possible spacetime manifestations of the areatime object (since addition in the exponent, representing the 'superposition of 2 rotations', corresponds to multiplying their factors together). Thus, the wave function, which is only associated with one of the two complex conjugate phase factors, is also associated only with what is in some sense a "square root" of all possible spacetime manifestations. To obtain the representation of all possible spacetime manifestations, one must take its absolute square, which in this context amounts to placing the two rotations 'on top' of each other. When the to rotations are 'on top' of each other, this becomes just the identity transformation (mathematically the product of two complex conjugate phases), which preserves the distinctness of the two time dimensions, as required.
22:56 Here I don't think I emphasized enough what I was trying to point out: If one conceives of the worldlines of the path integral as "actual" worldlines, then there is problem with special relativity which to my knowledge has not been pointed out before: the spacetime events which correspond to the termination of the worldlines leading up to those regions where the probability amplitude to find a particle vanishes become frame-dependent. But according to special relativity only the order of (spacelike separated) events can depend on an observer frame, not whether they actually occur or not.
On the other hand, considering the worldlines of the path integral as actualizable worldlines avoids this problem altogether: Since they are not actual spacetime objects, their termination is not a spacetime event. The only spacetime events are the actual "measurements" of the particles, and the occurrence of these is definitely not frame-dependent.
Further and more detailed information on this framework, can be found at deep blue, the University of Michigan's repository:
http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/13913/browse?type=author&order=ASC&rpp=20&value=Nikkhah+Shirazi%2C+Armin
Also, see
http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2474 (Imagination and the Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics: A Case Study in Quantum Mechanics)
I appreciate any constructive feedback.

Views: 2419
Armin Nikkhah Shirazi

SWTOR has added the ability to create characters with spaces in their names, so it’s time to have some fun!
Server: "Begeren Colony" (North America) Imperial guild: "Red October", Republic guild: "Blue October"
Server: "Red Eclipse" (Europe) Imperial guild: "Crimson Fall", Republic guild: "Azure Fall"
Thinking of trying SWTOR yourself or coming back from a break? Use my referral link: http://www.swtor.com/r/FyyY2C
Get all my announcements via Twitter:
http://twitter.com/joefantabulous
Want to see more of my stuff? Come read my blog:
http://jsfpcgc.blogspot.com/
Find out what is going on by looking at the calendar:
https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=qqgf1ngel8mhkirle7h4062h54%40group.calendar.google.com
This video was recorded with FRAPS on Windows 7 and transcoded by Handbrake on Linux Mint 17.1 KDE
FRAPS official website:
http://www.fraps.com/
Handbrake official website:
https://handbrake.fr/

Views: 491
Joe’s Super Fantabulous PC Gaming Channel

Part of the "Debunking quantum mind" series. This video looks at the "Copenhagen Interpretation". n.b althought there are many different views within Copenhagen this video focuses on Heisenberg's interpretation. i.e.
"Whatever Heisenberg's motivation, his invention of a unitary Copenhagen view on interpretation, at the center of which was his own, distinctively subjectivist view of the role of the observer, quickly found an audience."
- Found Here
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-copenhagen/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copenhagen_interpretation#cite_note-1
Shrodinger's Cat
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shrodingers_cat
Berkeley:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idealism#George_Berkeley
Buy this book!
http://www.amazon.com/Search-Schr%C3%B6dingers-Cat-Quantum-Physics/dp/0553342533

Views: 6923
Mechanics 0f Thought

Wave-Particle Duality, A Fundamental Property of the Universe visualized: raindrops on a car windshield and sunlight rippling through a venetian blind to form moving patterns on a white wall (June 2009). Garageband mix in September 2009.

Views: 6547
Jan Kather

I hope you will like this video, Kindly have a look:-
Please Subscribe to watch more interesting videos.
Like us
Comment below
Share this video if helpful
Hello Friends, Welcome to my youtube channel "do you know". In this channel you will get information about all general knowledge topic which include psychology, health tips , Interesting facts, history, face reading, palm reading, astrology, politics, numerology and basic computer Knowledge . All the information contain in this channel on basis of my personal studies and most of from internet.
for any health related issue you should consult a doctor before apply suggested remedy .

Views: 0
Do You Know ?

Idle Vast Expanses - "Copenhagen Interpretation"
https://soundcloud.com/idle-vast-expanses

Views: 4237
Isaias Valencia

This is the second digital assessment for my first semester Physics 1001 course.
Thank you for watching. :)

Views: 232
BRISHTI MUKHOPADHYAY 15BBT0172

For those of you in New York City you can check out Matt live at PBS Nerd Night at the NYC YouTube Space on Thursday night September 22nd. Hope to see you there. to.pbs.org/nerdnight
Albert Einstein strongly disagreed with Niels Bohr when it came to Bohr’s interpretation of quantum mechanics. Quantum entanglement settled the argument once and for all.
Get your own Space Time tshirt at http://bit.ly/1QlzoBi
Tweet at us! @pbsspacetime
Facebook: facebook.com/pbsspacetime
Email us! pbsspacetime [at] gmail [dot] com
Comment on Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/pbsspacetime
Support us on Patreon! http://www.patreon.com/pbsspacetime
Help translate our videos! http://www.youtube.com/timedtext_cs_panel?tab=2&c=UC7_gcs09iThXybpVgjHZ_7g
Previous Episode - Self-Replicating Robots and Galactic Domination
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4H55wybU3rI
Veritasium’s video Quantum Entanglement and Spooky Action at a Distance at 7:36
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuvK-od647c
How the Quantum Eraser Rewrites the Past at 8:41
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ORLN_KwAgs
Einstein argued that elementary particles maintained their intrinsic values whether they were being observed or not. Bohr believed that in observing such particles we collapsed a wave function of probabilities. He asserted that it is only when these wave functions collapse that one of many probabilities is chosen and the particles take on distinct values. Quantum entanglement, John Stewart Bell and Alain Aspect eventually proved that Bohr was correct.
Written and hosted by Matt O’Dowd
Produced by Rusty Ward
Made by Kornhaber Brown (www.kornhaberbrown.com)
Comments:
Borne Stellar
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4H55wybU3rI&lc=z13kddtono20c1h2g22kx1brstvvsthus
Strofi Kornego
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4H55wybU3rI&lc=z12vh34b2l2uxvagy04cg5swtqf0s3gb1o00k
Daniel Oberley
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4H55wybU3rI&lc=z12rsv2yszi5td21w22aytvhxvagg1giz04

Views: 1467524
PBS Space Time

Ruth Kastner, PhD, is a philosopher exploring the foundations of physics. She is on the faculty of the physics department at the State University of New York at Albany. She is also a research associate at the University of Maryland. She is author of The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: The Reality of Possibility and also Understanding Our Unseen World: Solving Quantum Riddles.
Here she points out that there are several interpretations of quantum mechanics that are very different from each other. She notes that there are many disagreements about the interpretation of the interpretations. She reviews the perspectives of great physicists such as Neils Bohr, Max Born, Ludwig Boltzmann, and David Bohm. She briefly describes the lesser known “transactional interpretation”. Then she focuses on the philosophical status of the crucial distinction between empirical and sub-empirical reality.
New Thinking Allowed host, Jeffrey Mishlove, PhD, is author of The Roots of Consciousness, Psi Development Systems, and The PK Man. Between 1986 and 2002 he hosted and co-produced the original Thinking Allowed public television series. He is the recipient of the only doctoral diploma in "parapsychology" ever awarded by an accredited university (University of California, Berkeley, 1980). He is a past vice-president of the Association for Humanistic Psychology; and is the recipient of the Pathfinder Award from that Association for his contributions to the field of human consciousness. He is also past-president of the non-profit Intuition Network, an organization dedicated to creating a world in which all people are encouraged to cultivate and apply their inner, intuitive abilities.
(Recorded on August 23, 2016)

Views: 18894
New Thinking Allowed with Jeffrey Mishlove

Video about the interactions between the observer and electons, the observer can change the behaviour of the electrons, this experiment results could change our wiew of the universe and our relationship with the matter, can we shape it?
I recommend two book in particular:
- The Olographic Universe by Michael Talbot
- The Tao of Physics by Fritjof Capra

Views: 21621
FirstTruthSeeker